Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Teaching versus Preaching

The other day in an e-mail to a friend I was bemoaning the fact that a lot of churches in our own Reformed Tradition (multiple denominations) were not preaching Christ and him crucified consistently from the pulpit. In fact one church that I looked at was just starting a series on how to handle money, entitled "The Master's Card." In that sermon there was nothing that made it "Christian." Just a lot about not having the "Mammon Card" but the "Master's Card" in our wallets. At one point the pastor turned to 1 John 2:6 (without reading the preceding verses) and his point was that we needed to walk as Jesus walked. I could hardly believe my ears. Here is a supposedly Reformed pastor telling us to ask the question "What Would Jesus Do?" Literally, "Jesus carried the Master's Card and so should we."


I also listened to an entire three part series on "Rekindling your Marriage." Again, there wasn't much to make these messages Christian. 95% of the sermon you could hear from Dr. Laura or any other secular advice columnist. There was one point in the second sermon that the pastor told the congregation that marriage is difficult because of the "depravity challenge." YES!! We are sinners and need to hear the gospel right? No. We were told that we are sinners, but ultimately we were left in our sin, misery, and depravity challenged marriages without an announcement that Christ came to save us from all of that. At the end of one of the sermons the pastor told us that we have a marriage Counselor in our marriage living in our home, the Holy Spirit. This idea came from Ephesians 4:30 which says, "And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption." The problem came when the pastor didn't finish the verse, and didn't add the part "for the day of redemption!" That adds a huge eschatological focus on what this being sealed by the Holy Spirit means! Sure there are benefits now, but ultimately the Spirit has been given to us for THE benefit of entering into our eternal rest. The pastor referenced Jesus' promise that the Spirit would come to be our Counselor. I assumed he was talking about John 14:16. This idea of the Holy Spirit as Counselor comes from the language of the courtroom. A better translation would be Advocate - a go between for us miserable sinners and a holy and just God.


I could comment a lot more on these sermons that I listened too (I downloaded more today so watch out!), but this is not my point right now. In my discussion with my friend we were talking about what a sermon actually is and what its central message should be (Christ and him crucified). However, this morning I had a revelation (not inspired!) that I was being too hard on these pastors. I was expecting them to be preaching. But I went back and looked at their church's websites and that is not what their goal is. Here is one example of a church's stated goal:

[This church's] morning services are designed to help people, wherever they are in their spiritual journey, move closer to God. We believe that authentic, creative worship, combined with relevant, biblical teaching, energizes people to live enthusiastically for God.
Ahhhh... they want to teach, not preach!! I was surprised to find that this was very common language when churches explain what happens on Sunday Morning. In that case what they are doing is just fine and I need to lay off of them a little bit. Granted, we need to pressure these pastors to actually preach, but at least they are staying true to their word and teaching every Sunday.

This may seem just like a small semantic argument, but it really isn't. Teaching and preaching are not synonyms - they are two different Greek words with some, but little overlap. I am not going to go into a full word study, but "teaching" (greek - didasko) in the NT usually has the unambiguous sense "to teach" or "to instruct" (TDNT). Whereas "preaching" (greek - karusso) really means "to proclaim" an event (TDNT). Some NT authors actually use the term "witness" as the act of preaching because of the nature of declaring something that happened.

As long as these "teachers" are doing just that, "teaching," I cannot be surprised that the proclamation of the gospel isn't given since there purpose is supposedly not to proclaim an event that happened. Even though that is exactly what a Christian pastor is to do:

13For "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved."


14How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? 15And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!" 16But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, "Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?" 17So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ" (Rom 10:13-17 ESV).

In closing, let me ask you to think about the sermons that you hear on a Sunday morning. Did you hear preaching or teaching? Did Christ have to die for that sermon to be true? If you do hear the proclamation of the gospel consistently week in and week out, then make sure that you thank your pastor for staying faithful to God's word. If you are getting more teaching than preaching, then you really should find a church that preaches the true unadulterated Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ because that is what we need to constantly hear as those who are simultaneously justified and yet sinful.

Labels: , ,

7 Comments:

Blogger Tracy Lee V said...

Hm. My pastor did a sermon on Jesus' parable to the rich man. So because it was about what Jesus said before he died, and not about his actual death, does that make it inconsequential? And if that's true, doesn't that make, huh, a good percentage of the Bible irrelevant?

If I already know the truth of Christ and him crucified, I have already been PREACHED to, and now need to be TAUGHT (yes, I almost said, TEACHED TO!) how to live my life today in light of that fact. So thank you, I won't be searching out the Reformed churches anytime soon for some good ol' fashioned preaching. I like my teaching just fine. And just for the record, my church's mission statement is as follows:

"The mission of First Evangelical Free Church is to exalt God by experiencing new life in Jesus Christ and sharing his life with others. (Acts 2:42-47)

Our vision is to cultivate a thriving urban community by experiencing life in Jesus.

We will passionately pursue this vision by engaging in:

SPIRITUAL FORMATION. Everyone who comes to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ is on a lifelong journey, becoming more like Jesus through the power of God's Spirit. As instructed in Scripture, we will encourage, teach and practice spiritual disciplines (such as prayer, fasting, service, etc.) as a means of knowing God and being changed by Him.

GENUINE COMMUNITY. God has created us to live in healthy interdependent relationships. Following the pattern of the early church, we will remain vitally connected to and support one another through our small groups and ministry teams.

VIBRANT WORSHIP. Our corporate worship will be authentic, vibrant and Spirit-led. We also recognize that God is honored as much by the way we relate to one another and handle conflict as He is in how we pray and worship together. As such we will also express our love for God by treating one another with love and dignity.

COMPASSIONATE OUTREACH. Since God calls us to make disciples of all nations, we will strategically reach diverse people in our local community, city and world by demonstrating Christ's love to the whole person in word and deed."

Just because I know you'll find something wrong with that, too. :) Hope you didn't miss the reference in there to TEACHING.

Man, you totally know how to push my buttons. It cracks me up. :)

1:44 PM  
Blogger Phil Walker said...

If I already know the truth of Christ and him crucified, I have already been PREACHED to, and now need to be TAUGHT … how to live my life today in light of that fact.

Tracy, may I say this as gently as I can? If you think you have comprehended the message of Christ and him crucified and are ready to move onto something new, then you haven't even begun to sound the depths of the Gospel. The Gospel is for Christians, too.

5:26 AM  
Blogger Mark Vander Pol said...

Tracy! I am not intentionally pushing your buttons, honest! But if that happens, maybe that is good for both of us as we discuss something passionately!

First of all, I agree with what Phil wrote - the Gospel is for Christians too! We are still struggling with sin everyday even though we have been justified in Christ! Romans 7 explains this beautifully. Because of those struggles, we need to hear the gospel message of Christ and him crucified constantly because the gospel is not something that comes naturally to us. The gospel message never gets old because God has tied his promises to that message and none other. His Word will not return to him void!

How we live in the world flows out of our being redeemed and showing our gratitude to God for his mercies shown in Christ. Sure there are many topics that we need to hear as Christians living in this world, but those TEACHINGS should not take the place of PREACHING. Do it in an adult Sunday School or midweek study. The Sunday sermon is an exposition of God's Word pointing people to Christ. Also, how are unbelievers supposed to have the gospel proclaimed to them on a Sunday morning if there is only teaching? Finally, this teaching ministry is all law, and that is what our natural man likes to hear! Pastors need to tell us stuff we don't like to hear - blood, propitiation, justification, God's holiness, etc.

I want to comment on the first part of your post concerning that part of the Bible that was before Christ's death and resurrection. It must be stated that the central message of the Bible is God redeeming for himself a people through the life, death, and resurrection of his Son. Therefore, to have a sermon from anywhere in the Bible and divorcing it from the central plot-line does it a gross injustice (it can actually be idolatrous or taking God's name in vain). It is like taking just one scene from a play without putting that scene its proper context of the entire play. Without that grounding in the plot you can totally misinterpret the meaning of that scene.

We are CHRISTians, and Christ came to do one thing - redeem for himself a people through his substitutionary sacrifice. As been said by better theologians than I, "What Has Jesus Done?" is the proper question; it is NOT "What Would Jesus Do?"

9:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I feel your pain Tracy. I basically said the same thing in my email to Mark which started our own conversation concerning: "Where then does the teaching belong?"
I'm still struggling with that question.

7:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This seems to tie in with the issue some people have with using typology and Redemptive/Historical methods as a matrix for making the bible Gospel comprehensive. In their fear of boxing in scripture they end up producing moralistic sermons that seem to lead the Christian to think that the Gospel just gets them in the door, but that we need to move onto other things. This seems to make man the measure of all things and transform the sunday service, at least, into a group therapy session rather than the one day a week that the kingdom is seen and we receive from our God.

Just a thought.

11:01 AM  
Blogger Tracy Lee V said...

Hm. WhiskeyJack has most likely never been to a group therapy session. As someone who has actually led one, I would respectfully (see, Mark, I'm growing!) disagree.

But an interesting point, nonetheless. I disagree regarding my own personal experience in non-Reformed churches, but I will concede that the attitude that he mentions could certainly be out there.

Look at you, Mark. Spurring all kinds of dialogue on this one!

9:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tracy

I actually have been to many group therapy sessions and don't find much use in them myself. I have bipolar disorder and consequently I have been knee deep in the therapeutic side of our culture.

But the point I was trying to make was that if the Gospel is not the ever present and primary purpose of Preaching then it will ultimately be about us and not Christ. If we miss Christ in the text we will always find law and essentially that is what therapy is, do this and live. And don't get me wrong, I am not opposed to therapy as such, just its presence in church.
As well, I was using the term "group" rather loosely rather then referring to an actual collective therapy session.
Love the discussion

9:01 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home